About this listing
Leah Hoopes | The Delco Patriot is a Telegram channel listed on TeleHub. View its description, category, member count, and Telegram join link.
TelehubInsights into election infrastructure and law from Leah Hoopes—Krav Maga Instructor.
Leah Hoopes | The Delco Patriot is a Telegram channel listed on TeleHub. View its description, category, member count, and Telegram join link.
Join Leah Hoopes as she dives deep into matters of election integrity, legal affairs, and public accountability. With a sharp critique that is decidedly not politically correct, members can expect discussions that challenge conventional narratives. Whether you're invested in voting systems or local governance, Leah's unique perspective promises to shed light on pressing issues. Stay informed and engaged with the evolving landscape of electoral rights.
Loading recent Telegram analytics…
TeleHub helps users discover Telegram communities, but users should review each community before joining. Report misleading, unsafe, or inappropriate listings.
Report a listingClick the join button to open Leah Hoopes | The Delco Patriot on Telegram.
No, Leah Hoopes | The Delco Patriot is not marked as NSFW. Users should still review the community before joining.
Leah Hoopes | The Delco Patriot is listed under Election Integrity, Legal Affairs, Community Discussion on TeleHub.
Statistics updated September 9, 2026
Post frequency is estimated from the latest 30 stored public posts and may undercount activity.
STOP ACTING LIKE THE ONLY PROSECUTABLE ACT IS CASTING A BALLOT. It isn't. There can be separate acts, separate evidence, and potentially separate violations from start to finish. Here is the simplest way to understand it: 1. QUALIFICATION The law establishes who is qualified. You either meet those statutory qualifications or you don't. 2. APPLICATION You submit an application representing that you meet those qualifications. That is an act. 3. ATTESTATION You sign your name affirming that the information you provided is true and that you are qualified. That is another legally significant act. 4. KNOWLEDGE Now comes the critical question: Did you KNOW that you did not meet the qualifications when you made that representation? That is where evidence of knowledge and intent becomes important. 5. FALSE STATEMENT If someone knowingly provides materially false information on an application or declaration, the potential legal issue already exists. You don't necessarily have to wait for that person to later cast a ballot before investigating the earlier conduct. 6. THEN COMES VOTING Actually voting can create additional legal questions depending upon the circumstances. But voting is not what magically transforms every previous act into legally relevant conduct. The application happened. The representation happened. The signature happened. The attestation happened. And, if evidence establishes it, the knowing falsification happened. Pennsylvania law already contains criminal provisions addressing voter-registration misconduct, including knowingly false declarations and applying for registration while knowing or having reason to know that you are not entitled to register. The same basic concept exists throughout our legal system. If you apply for a license or government benefit requiring certain qualifications, your eligibility is one question. What you represent on the application is another. What you attest to when you sign it is another. Whether the representation was false is another. Whether you knew it was false is another. And whether those facts satisfy the elements of a particular criminal statute is the ultimate prosecutorial question. Qualification → Application → Attestation → Knowledge → Falsification → Potential prosecution. These are separate legal concepts. So stop telling the public that nothing potentially prosecutable has occurred simply because someone hasn't reached the final step. The law can attach consequences to knowingly false statements and applications themselves. You do not always have to wait for the ultimate act to occur before earlier completed conduct becomes legally significant.
Let's apply the vaccine and countermeasures framework to any other industry. The government imposes an excise tax on the product to help fund compensation for certain injuries. Congress creates a special compensation system rather than leaving every injured person to the ordinary civil-liability system. Then, under the PREP Act, when a product qualifies as a covered countermeasure under an applicable declaration, covered manufacturers and other covered persons can receive sweeping statutory liability protections. Now imagine that framework for cars, airplanes, baby products, construction equipment, or virtually any other consumer product. You would lose your mind. You would demand to know: Why does this industry receive extraordinary liability protection? Why is the injured person pushed into a government-created compensation framework? Who ultimately bears the financial risk? Does limiting ordinary tort liability weaken an important mechanism for accountability? And why shouldn't consumers scrutinize a product when Congress itself has created extraordinary legal mechanisms governing injury and liability? Those aren't “anti-science” questions. They are questions about risk, liability, accountability, informed consent, and government policy. You don't get to preach bodily autonomy and corporate accountability everywhere else, then suddenly declare those concepts dangerous when someone applies them to vaccines or covered countermeasures. If your position cannot survive the same accountability standards you would enthusiastically impose on every other industry, the problem isn't the person asking questions.
https://delcopatriot2020.substack.com/p/pennsylvanias-energy-crossroads-why?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=24vfjx I called out Shapiro 6 years ago, the World is catching up THANK YOU LORD.